On macOS, Apple has intentionally broken Boot Camp. Virtualization – where the OS runs within a virtual machine (VM) provided by a hypervisor – most likely Parallels.Boot Camp – where the OS runs on the hardware of the Apple-silicon-based Mac itself.On an Apple silicon-based Mac, customers really only have one way to run Windows: It let you play games and run other applications that do not run well or not run at all when Windows is virtualized.It let you take full advantage of all of your Mac’s performance (CPU, GPU, RAM).It didn’t require paying for a third-party hypervisor (only paying for Windows at retail).The key advantages of Boot Camp were (simplistically) three-fold: Since both of these relied on a regular install of Windows (I’m trivializing a handful of things here), almost any application that would run on an Intel/AMD-based PC that shipped with Windows would also run on Windows when running physically or virtually on an Intel-based Mac. Virtualization – where the OS runs within a virtual machine (VM) provided by a hypervisor – typically either VMware or Parallels.Boot Camp – where the OS runs on the hardware of the Intel-based Mac itself. On an Intel-based Mac, customers have come to rely on running Windows in one of two ways: Let’s take a step back for a second and clarify a few things. The person looking for help said someone else had gotten it working, but it would not work for him when he tried to run it on his Apple silicon Mac through Parallels. The other of these was an issue with an industry application designed for Windows on Intel. To me, this is a Parallels issue to solve. It would start, work, be suspended, and then fail to resume. One of these was an issue with Windows on ARM itself behaving unreliably under Parallels on an Apple silicon Mac. If a customer hits an issue with Windows running on an Apple silicon (M1 or newer) Mac, or an issue with an application or other software running on said Apple silicon Mac, where is a customer supposed to go to solve the issue? The answer to this is thorny and complex, and… it’s probably not great. In the past week, I’ve seen two threads that concern me, as I see a little bit of a storm brewing. This is important, particularly for businesses that have come to rely on Windows. “Note that the EULA does stipulate that not all versions of Windows are supported on all device types, so theoretically customers could run into compatibility issues with performance & support case by case…” Microsoft response received via email. In my last post, I discussed the fact that Microsoft seems to have clarified whether people can license and run Windows on an Apple silicon Mac – and by and large, I think the matter is settled from a licensing perspective.īut I also mentioned that in terms of support, Microsoft’s representative told me the following through email:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |